Checkpointing: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some recipes and tips for checkpointing on | Some recipes and tips for checkpointing on Anunna | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Modify the code to implement the following recipe: | Modify the code to implement the following recipe: | ||
1. Look for a state file that includes all imformation required to restore the state when the program was stopped. | <source lang=text> | ||
2. If it exists, read it and restore the state. Else, create an intial state. | 1. Look for a state file that includes all imformation required to restore the state when the program | ||
was stopped. | |||
2. If it exists, read it and restore the state. Else, create an intial state. | |||
3. Periodically save the state to the state file. | 3. Periodically save the state to the state file. | ||
</source> | |||
This recipe is applicable to several languages (e.g., R, Python, Matlab, Fortran, C, shell,...). Also, the checkpointing of parallel programs is easier after a global synchronization.<br /> | This recipe is applicable to several languages (e.g., R, Python, Matlab, Fortran, C, shell,...). Also, the checkpointing of parallel programs is easier after a global synchronization.<br /> | ||
The checkpointing requires | The checkpointing requires:<br /> | ||
* to write some additional code; | * some efforts to write some additional code; | ||
* some memory (e.g. for a state file). One must be careful to what is saved; | * some memory (e.g. for a state file). One must be careful to what is saved; | ||
* some time (e.g., to write the state file). Therefore, checkpointing too often must be avoided. Also, SLURM and other software features can be used to checkpoint at some specific points. | * some time (e.g., to write the state file). Therefore, checkpointing too often must be avoided. Also, SLURM and other software features can be used to checkpoint at some specific points. | ||
===The code is not accessible=== | ===The code is not accessible=== | ||
Many software we used are checkpointable:<br /> | Many software we used are checkpointable:<br /> | ||
* If it is the case, the (SLURM) script should be adapt to use this advantage. | * If it is the case, the (SLURM) script should be adapt to use this advantage. | ||
* If the software is really not checkpointable, some software are available to checkpoint existing programs. One of them is DMTCP (Distributed MultiThreaded CheckPointing; [http://dmtcp.sourceforge.net/ DMTCP]). The SLURM script must be modified to use it efficiently on | * If the software is really not checkpointable, some software are available to checkpoint existing programs. One of them is DMTCP (Distributed MultiThreaded CheckPointing; [http://dmtcp.sourceforge.net/ DMTCP]). The SLURM script must be modified to use it efficiently on Anunna. |
Latest revision as of 14:42, 19 March 2019
Some recipes and tips for checkpointing on Anunna
Definition
Checkpointing: Saving the program's state at a checkpoint with the aim to restart it from that point in case of (un)planned stop of failure.
It is interesting for, e.g., long jobs that could be (un)voluntary killed, or jobs running on unstable computing systems.
Two types of program
The code is accessible
Recipe
Modify the code to implement the following recipe:
<source lang=text> 1. Look for a state file that includes all imformation required to restore the state when the program was stopped. 2. If it exists, read it and restore the state. Else, create an intial state. 3. Periodically save the state to the state file. </source>
This recipe is applicable to several languages (e.g., R, Python, Matlab, Fortran, C, shell,...). Also, the checkpointing of parallel programs is easier after a global synchronization.
The checkpointing requires:
- some efforts to write some additional code;
- some memory (e.g. for a state file). One must be careful to what is saved;
- some time (e.g., to write the state file). Therefore, checkpointing too often must be avoided. Also, SLURM and other software features can be used to checkpoint at some specific points.
The code is not accessible
Many software we used are checkpointable:
- If it is the case, the (SLURM) script should be adapt to use this advantage.
- If the software is really not checkpointable, some software are available to checkpoint existing programs. One of them is DMTCP (Distributed MultiThreaded CheckPointing; DMTCP). The SLURM script must be modified to use it efficiently on Anunna.